Article withdrawal procedure

According to the COPE Recommendations, which are followed by the journal "Movoznavstvo", the article can be recalled for the following reasons:

1. Unreliable conclusions based on explicit evidence of misconduct (e.g. fraudulent use of data) or honest error (e.g., miscalculation or experimental error).
2. Conclusions that were previously published elsewhere without relevant cross-references, permission or justification.
3. Plagiarism or other type of unethical research, misconduct.

Retraction procedure

For the retraction procedure, the JOURNAL "Movoznavstvo" uses the EASE Retraction Form.

The retraction should take place after the journal editors have carefully considered the appeals received from editors, authors or readers.

If, as a result of consideration of such an appeal, it was found that:

• conclusions are unreliable or made on the basis of a significant error (for example, miscalculation or experimental error), or as a result of falsification (for example, manipulation with the image);
• in the text there is plagiarism or inappropriate used AI;
• the findings were previously published elsewhere without a due reference to previous sources or disclosures to the editor, permission to re-publish or justification;
• the text contains materials or data for the use of which the proper permission has not been obtained;
• copyright or confidentiality was violated;
• research contradicts the ethical policy of the journal;
• the publication took place exclusively on the basis of a compromised or manipulation process of reviewing;
• the author(s) did not provide information on the information on the conflict of interest,

The PDF file of the retracted article is re-published on the website by adding a watermark with the "Revoked" note on each page.

Statement of concern

The journal editors should consider publishing a statement of concern on the website:

• in case of unlawful behavior of the authors during the study or publication;
• if the authors have provided unreliable findings, but the institution or organization in which the authors are affiliated do not plan to investigate the case or do not have the appropriate procedure for this;
• when the consideration of the appeal on the violation of academic integrity continues, but there are reasonable grounds to believe that the decision will not be made for a long time.