Ганна Межжеріна. Соціально-етичний портрет татар у Галицько-Волинському літописі (Батий, Ногай, Телебуга, Кончак, Бурундай). 2
DOI 10.33190/0027-2833-345-2025-6-004
Навчально-науковий інститут міжнародного співробітництва та освіти
Державного університету «Київський авіаційний інститут»
просп. Любомира Гузара, 1, м. Київ, 03058, Україна
Електронна пошта: Ця електронна адреса захищена від спам-ботів. Вам необхідно увімкнути JavaScript, щоб побачити її.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8900-577X
Hanna MEZHZHERINA
Educational and Scientific Institute of International Cooperation and Education
State University «Kyiv Aviation Institute»
1 Lubomyr Husar Ave., Kyiv, 03058, Ukraine
E-mail: Ця електронна адреса захищена від спам-ботів. Вам необхідно увімкнути JavaScript, щоб побачити її.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8900-577X
THE SOCIO-ETHICAL PORTRAIT OF THE TARTARS IN THE GALICIAN-VOLHYNIAN CHRONICLE (Batu, Nogay, Telebuga, Konchak, Burunday). 2
The process of conceptualizing the image of the Mongol-Tatars in the Ipatiev Chronicle is investigated, static socio-ethical portraits of the Mongol-Tatars («безбожнымъ Татаромъ», «ѡканьнаго Кончака», etc.) have been reconstructed. The semantics and functional-pragmatic purpose of the epithets-designations used in relation to the Tatars have been clarified. The 19th and 20th-centuries editions of the Ipatiev Chronicle of the older edition are compared. It was revealed that the indexes «I. Personal Names», «II. Geographical», «III. Subjects», compiled by A. M. Truvorov for the 1871 edition, were subsequently either unfairly ignored or used without indicating the author’s name. In the Galician-Volhynian Chronicle (part of the Ipatiev Chronicle according to the list of 1425), in articles 1224–1283, generalized socio-ethical portraits of the Tatars and individualized portraits of Tatar khans and voivodes were found; the chronological timeframes of the use of epithets in portraits have been clarified. Every fifth military leader named in the chronicle received a moral assessment in the form of epithets next to the person’s name, in particular Batu, Nogay, Telebuga, Konchak, Burunday. The reasons for the appearance of negatively connoted Old Ruthenian adjectives безбожьныи, безаконьныи, зълыи, нечьстивыи, ѡканьныи, поганыи, проклѧтыи in the chronicle portraits of the Tatars have been revealed. A special function in the conceptualization of the image of the Tatars belongs to paired word combinations ѡканьныи и безаконьныи, ѡканьныи и проклѧтыи, безбожьныи зълыи, names моавитяне, агаряне, измаилтѧнѣ and comparative formula «"ко свѣрпыи звѣрь». It is proven that the key function in the conceptualization of the image of Telebuga in the chronicle is performed by the structure of the story about Telebuga’s campaign in Polish lands. Genetic connections have been identified between the chronicle story about the murder of Prince Igor Olgovich in the article 1147, the story about the execution of Prince Vsevolod Yurievich in the article of 1237, the story about the execution of Prince Mikhail of Chernihiv in the article of 1245, the Serapion of Vladimir’s «Sermon», the «The Legend of Boris and Gleb», as well as the connection between the story about Telebuga’s campaign in Polish lands and «The Tale of Bygone Years». It was found that the Galician-Volhynian Chronicle does not mention two people named Burundaj (as indicated in the indexes), but only one. The assumption that after the death of Bolesław of Krakow, Prince Lev Danylowicz in *1280 made an attempt to seize the Lublin Land or the Krakow has been refuted.
Keywords : Galician-Volhynian Chronicle, socio-ethical portrait, Old Ruthenian adjective, Mongol-Tatars, Batu, Nogay, Telebuga, Konchak, Burunday.
________________________________________________________
 mov_2025_6_4.pdf | [ ] | 448 Кб | 96 Завантаження |
.%202 "Pin It"){kind=icon}